Preview

Fundamental and Clinical Medicine

Advanced search

RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate early and long-term results of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension and different anatomy of renal arter-ies as compared to those who underwent a conser-vative treatment.Materials and Methods. We recruited 53 con-secutive patients with resistant hypertension (25 males and 28 females, median age 54 (interquartile range 43-66) years). Depending on the anatomy of renal arteries defined by non-invasive visualization, patients who underwent renal denervation were as-signed into the subgroups with typical anatomy (A1 and A2) and with multiple arteries (B1 and B2). Pa-tients with complex renal anatomy unacceptable for the surgery or those who refused to undergo renal denervation received conservative therapy. Evalua-tion of blood pressure (BP) was performed at the baseline and upon 12 months of follow-up.Results. Patients with typical anatomy of renal arteries were characterized by significant decrease in mean BP as well as its variability (from 20 to 11 mmHg and from 17 to 10 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). Index of BP time de-creased from 100 to 25% for systolic BP and from 90 to 45% for diastolic BP (р < 0.05). Similar dy-namics were revealed in the B1 subgroup (all arter-ies available for ablation) of patients with multiple arteries. In the B2 subgroup (≥ 1 artery unavail-able for ablation) office and 24-hour BP decreased significantly from 165/95 to 155/90 mmHg (р ≤ 0.05), and mean systolic BP also decreased from 165 to 150 mmHg (p = 0.04). Patients with com-plete renal denervation (A1 + B1) were character-ized by a significant reduction of mean systolic BP (25 mmHg) as compared to those with incomplete renal denervation (10 mmHg) or conservative therapy (1 mmHg).Conclusions. The long-term efficacy of renal denervation was superior to conservative therapy in BP reduction, its variability and time index re-gardless of the anatomy of renal arteries. However, BP reduction in patients with incomplete denervation was less pronounced.

About the Authors

TATIANA Y. Chichkova
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation


SERGEY E. Mamchur
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation


MARIA P. Romanova
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation


EGOR A. Khomenko
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation


ALEXANDR Y. Ivanov
Omsk Cardiology Dispensary
Russian Federation


References

1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. Blood Press. 2014; 23 (1): 3-16

2. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O'Neill WW, D'Agostino R, Flack JM, Katzen BT, et al. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370 (15): 1393-1401

3. Mahfoud F, Tunev S, Ewen S, Cremers B, Ruwart J, Schulz-Jander D, et al. Impact of Lesion Placement on Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66 (16): 1766-1175

4. Chen W, Ling Z, Du H, Song W, Xu Y, Liu Z, et al. The effect of two different renal denervation strategies on blood pressure in resistant hypertension: Comparison of full-length versus proximal renal artery ablation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88 (5): 786-795

5. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J Bartus K, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9671): 1275-1281.

6. Rimoldi SF, Scheidegger N, Scherrer U, Farese S, Rexhaj E, Moschovitis A, et al. Anatomical eligibility of the renal vasculature for catheter-based renal denervation in hypertensive patients. JACC CardiovascInterv. 2014; 7 (2): 187-192

7. Okada T, Pellerin O, Savard S, Curis E, Monge M, Frank M, et al. Eligibility for renal denervation: anatomical classification and results in essential resistant hypertension. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015; 38 (1): 79-87

8. Satyapal KS, Haffejee AA, Singh B, Ramsaroop L, Robbs JV, Kalideen JM. Additional renal arteries: incidence and morphometry. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001; 23 (1): 33-38

9. Bordei P, Sapte E, Iliescu D. Double renal arteries originating from the aorta. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004; 26 (6): 474-479

10. Чичкова Т.Ю., Мамчур С.Е., Хоменко Е.А., Романова М.П., Мамчур И.Н., Тришкина Н.Н. Отбор больных резистентной артериальной гипертензией для выполнения ренальной денервации // Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2017. Т. 6, № 4. С. 80-88

11. Оzkan U, Oguzkurt L, Tercan F, Kizikilic O, Koc Z, Koca N. Renal artery origins and variations: angiographic evaluation of 855 consecutive patients. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2006; 12 (4): 183-186

12. Kumar S, Neyaz Z, Gupta A. The Utility of 64 Channel Multidetector CT Angiography for Evaluating the Renal Vascular Anatomy and Possible Variations: a Pictorial Essay. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11 (3): 346-354

13. Glodny B, Cromme S, Reimer P, Lennarz M, Winde G, Vetter H. Hypertension associated with multiple renal arteries may be rennin-dependent. J Hypertens. 2000; 18 (10): 1437-1444

14. Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML et al. Renal denervation in multiple renal arteries. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014; 44 (8): 728-735

15. Gupta A, Tello R. Accessory renal arteries are not related to hypertension risk: a review of MR angiography data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182 (6): 1521-1524

16. de Jong MR, Hoogerwaard AF, Gal P, Adiyaman A, Smit JJ, Delnoy PP, et al. Persistent Increase in Blood Pressure After Renal Nerve Stimulation in Accessory Renal Arteries After Sympathetic Renal Denervation. Hypertension. 2016; 67 (6): 1211-1217

17. Vаclavik J, Taborsky M, Richter D. Unilateral catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in resistant arterial hypertension shows no blood pressure-lowering effect. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2013; 35 (3): 192-194

18. Hering D, Marusic P, Walton AS, Duval J, Lee R, Sata Y, et al. Renal artery anatomy affects the blood pressure response to renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 202: 388-393


Review

For citations:


Chichkova T.Y., Mamchur S.E., Romanova M.P., Khomenko E.A., Ivanov A.Y. RENAL DENERVATION: IMPACT OF ANATOMY ON PROCEDURE OUTCOME. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2018;3(4):22-31. (In Russ.)

Views: 351


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-0764 (Print)
ISSN 2542-0941 (Online)