Preview

Fundamental and Clinical Medicine

Advanced search

CLINICAL COURSE AND PROGNOSIS OF «NEAR MISS» ECTOPIC PREGNANCY

Abstract

Aim. To identify risk factors for «near miss» ectopic pregnancy. Materials and Methods. We recruited 720 consecutive women with ectopic pregnancy who were admitted to the gynecology unit of a large multidisciplinary hospital from 2007 to 2017. All patients were divided into two groups: without «near miss» (n = 666) and with «near miss» ectopic pregnancy (n = 54) defined by potentially life-threatening conditions such as massive (> 1500 mL) intraabdominal bleeding, multiple organ failure syndrome, or sepsis. Short-term outcomes were evaluated on the 6th day postoperation. Results. Certain risk factors for «near miss» were uncontrollable such as cardiovascular disease (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.0-9.8, p = 0.004) and past medical history of obstetric or gynecological disorders, in particular spontaneous miscarriage (OR = 15.6, 95% CI = 7.7-31.7, p = 0.001). Controllable risk factors included rare types of ectopic pregnancy (OR = 3757.4, 95% CI = 625-30567, p = 0.001) such as interstitial pregnancy (OR= 896.3, 95% CI = 121.3-1864.4, p = 0.001). Conclusion. Rare types of ectopic pregnancy represent a valuable predictor of «near miss» condition.

About the Authors

LARISA E. Fetischeva
Podgorbunsky Regional Clinical Emergency Hospital
Russian Federation


VADIM G. Mozes
Kemerovo State Medical University
Russian Federation


IGOR S. Zakharov
Kemerovo State Medical University
Russian Federation


T. M. Sokolova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Здравоохранение в России. 2017. Москва: Росстат, 2017. 170 с.

2. Lima HM, Carvalho FH, Feitosa FE, Nunes GC. Factors associated with maternal mortality among patients meeting criteria of severe maternal morbidity and near miss. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 136(3): 337-343.

3. Jabir M, Abdul-Salam I, Suheil DM, Al-Hilli W, Abul-Hassan S, Al-Zuheiri A, et al. Maternal near miss and quality of maternal health care in Baghdad, Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 11.

4. Say L, Souza JP, Robert C. Pattinson for the WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss - towards a standard tool for monitor quality of maternal health care. Elsevier, 2009. Р. 12-19.

5. Фетищева Л.Е., Захаров И.С., Ушакова Г.А., Мозес В.Г., Демьянова Т.Н., Васютинская Ю.В. и др. Интерстициальная беременность - трудности диагностики (клинический случай) // Мать и дитя в Кузбассе. 2017. № 2. С. 55-58.

6. Souza J., Cecatti JG, Haddad SM, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, Katz L, et al. The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the maternal severity index model (msi): tools for assessing the management of severe maternal morbidity. PloS One. 2012; 7(8): e44129.

7. Cylus J, Papanicolas I, Smith PC. How to make sense of health system efficiency comparisons. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2017. Р. 13-18.


Review

For citations:


Fetischeva L.E., Mozes V.G., Zakharov I.S., Sokolova T.M. CLINICAL COURSE AND PROGNOSIS OF «NEAR MISS» ECTOPIC PREGNANCY. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2018;3(2):42-50. (In Russ.)

Views: 459


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-0764 (Print)
ISSN 2542-0941 (Online)