Hygienic assessment of red and processed meat consumption among the adult population of Omsk region
https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2025-10-3-5-14
Abstract
Aim. To assess the consumption of red and processed meat among the adult population of Omsk Region in order to determine its significance as a risk factor for chronic non-communicable diseases. Materials and Methods. In 2023, a quota-based sample of the adult population of Omsk Region (n = 506) was surveyed. The frequency method was used to determine the amount and frequency of consumption of various meat products. Consumption was assessed in accordance with the World Health Organization guidelines. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the proportion of respondents who exceed the recommended meat consumption levels by sex and place of residence. Results. Excessive consumption of red meat was observed in every second resident of the Omsk region (51.2 ± 2.2%), in particular in combination with processed meat (71.2 ± 2.0 %). Sausage products accounted for 28.5% of total meat intake, poultry for 17.5 %, dumplings for 13.5 %, and pork and beef dishes for 10.9 % each. Red meat accounted for 50.8 % of consumed meat products. Average weekly red meat consumption was 624.4 ± 21.5 g, and men consumed more than women (690.6 ± 35.1 g per week versus 568.8 ± 26.0 g, respectively, p = 0.002). Processed meat accounted for 42 % of all meat products consumed. The highest consumption levels of meat products, including specific categories (red meat, processed meat, and red processed meat), were observed among urban residents compared with rural residents (p = 0.000), and among men compared with women (p = 0.015). Age-related differences in meat consumption, both overall and by category of meat products, were not statistically significant. Conclusion. Excessive consumption of red and processed meat among the majority of the adult population in the Omsk region poses additional cancer and cardiometabolic health risks.
About the Authors
Yu. V. MenshchikovaRussian Federation
Dr. Yulia V. Menshchikova, MD, Postgraduate Student, Department of Hygiene and Human Nutrition
Lenina Street, 12, Omsk, 644099
E. A. Vilms
Russian Federation
Dr. Elena A. Vilms, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology
Lenina Street, 12, Omsk, 644099
M. S. Turchaninova
Russian Federation
Dr. Maria S. Turchaninova, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Hygiene and Human Nutrition
Lenina Street, 12, Omsk, 644099
N. A. Kruch
Russian Federation
Mr. Nikolay A. Kruch, Master's student
Lenina Street, 12, Omsk, 644099
A. V. Brusentsova
Russian Federation
Dr. Anna V. Brusentsova, MD, Cand. Sci., (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Hygiene and Human Nutrition
Lenina Street, 12, Omsk, 644099
References
1. Huang Y, Cao D, Chen Z, Chen B, Li J, Guo J et al. Red and processed meat consumption and cancer outcomes: Umbrella review. Food Chem. 2021;356:129697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129697
2. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, Ghissassi FE, BenbrahimTallaa L et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015;(16):1599–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1
3. Gorbunova NA. Assessing the role of meat consumption in human evolutionary changes. A review. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing. 2024;9(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2024-9-1-53-64
4. Domingo JL, Nadal M. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red meat and processed meat: A review of scientific news since the IARC decision. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;105:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.028
5. Cascella M, Bimonte S, Barbieri A, Del Vecchio V, Caliendo D, Schiavone V et al. Dissecting the mechanisms and molecules underlying the potential carcinogenicity of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer (CRC): an overview on the current state of knowledge. Infect Agent Cancer. 2018;13:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-018-0174-9
6. Domingo JL, Nadal M. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat: What about environmental contaminants? Environ Res. 2016;145:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.031
7. Apata ES, Lasisi OT, Olaleye OO, Apata OC, Okolosi JE, UthmanAkinhanmi YO et al. Effect of replacing nitrite with ginger powder in brine solution on the quality of cured beef. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing. 2025;1(10):67–74. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-1-67-74
8. Dong X, Zhuang Z, Zhao Y, Song Z, Xiao W, Wang W et al. Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption, Plasma Metabolome, and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study of UK Biobank. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(7):e027934. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027934
9. Farvid MS, Sidahmed E, Spence ND, Mante Angua K, Rosner BA, Barnett JB. Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(9):937–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00741-9
10. Shi W, Huang X, Schooling CM, Zhao JV. Red meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(28):2626–2635. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad336
11. WHO. Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat. Available at: https://www.who.int/newsroom/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-theconsumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat. Accessed: July 6, 2025.
12. WHO report says eating processed meat is carcinogenic: Understanding the findings. Available at: https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/2015/11/03/report-says-eating-processed-meat-is-carcinogenicunderstanding-the-findings/ Accessed: July 6, 2025.
13. Martinchik AN, Baturin AK, Baeva BC. Izuchenie fakticheskogo pitanija s pomoshh'ju analiza chastoty potreblenija pishhi: sozdanie voprosnika i ocenka dostovernosti metoda. Profilaktika zabolevanij i ukreplenie zdorov'ja.1998;1(5):14–19. (In Russ).
14. Nutriciologija i klinicheskaja dietologija: nacional'noe rukovodstvo. Tutel'jana VA, Nikitjuka DB, editors. Moscow: GEOTARMediaPubl, 2021. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-6280-5-NKD-2021-1-1008
15. Martinchik AN. Nutriciologija. Osnovy pitanija cheloveka. Moscow: GEOTAR-MediaPubl, 2023. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.33029/9704- 7782-3-NOP-2023-1-504
16. Martinchik AN, Baturin AK. Al'bom porcij produktov i bljud. Moscow: Institut pitanija RAMN; 1995. (In Russ).
17. Federal'naja sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki. Potreblenie osnovnyh produktov pitanija v Omskoj oblasti (na dushu naselenija v god; kilogrammov). (In Russ). Available at: https://55.rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/potreblenie2023.htm?ysclid=m9gmvz6aou336947464. Accessed: July 6, 2025.
18. Kruch ON, Turchaninov DV, Vilms EA, Shirlina NG. Prevalence of oncopatology risk factors among residents of the Omsk region. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2023;8(2):77–86. (In Russ). https://doi. org/10.23946/2500-0764-2023-8-2-77-86
19. Kaveshnikov VS, Trubacheva IA, Serebryakova VN. Unprocessed red meat consumption in the general working-age population: sociodemographic, behavioral and health-related determinants. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2024;93(5):65–72. https://doi.org/10.33029/0042-8833-2024-93-5-65-72 (in Russ).
Review
For citations:
Menshchikova Yu.V., Vilms E.A., Turchaninova M.S., Kruch N.A., Brusentsova A.V. Hygienic assessment of red and processed meat consumption among the adult population of Omsk region. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2025;10(3):5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2025-10-3-5-14