Pregnancy in the rudimentary uterine horn
https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2020-5-1-94-98
Abstract
Aim. To develop the methodology to assess the standards of physical development of children and adolescents.
Materials and Methods. We have analyzed the available literature and our previous results to identify current problems in evaluating physical development of children with the focus on regional standards.
Results. Current methodology in the field clearly needs standardization. We propose that “Standards of physical development of children and adolescents” software enables the objective evaluation of physical development in relation to children and adolescents and therefore can be suggested as a golden standard. Comparative analysis of the anthropometric data using this program and standard descriptive statistics (SPSS 21) showed the similarity of the results.
Conclusions. Contemporary problems in the study of physical development of children and adolescents include the lack of standardized methods, standards, and official documents. We suggest our novel approach as a promising solution.
About the Authors
N. B. Kolesnikova
Kemerovo State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Natalia B. Kolesnikova - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
22a, Voroshilova Street, Kemerovo, 650056
T. Yu. Marochko
Kemerovo State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Tatyana Yu. Marochko - MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
22a, Voroshilova Street, Kemerovo, 650056
A. S. Сhuikova
Belyaev Kemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Alexandra S. Сhuikova - MD, Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Pregnancy Pathology Unit.
22, Oktyabr'skiy avenue, Kemerovo, 650056
N. V. Artymuk
Kemerovo State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prof. Natalia V. Artymuk - MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
22a, Voroshilova Street, Kemerovo, 650056
References
1. Savlieva GM, Suchich GT, Serov VN, Radzinsky VE, Manuchin IB. Gyne- 6. cology. Moscow: GEOTAR-MediaPubl; 2017. (In Russ.).
2. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21. BJOG. 2016;123(13):e15-e55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.141897.
3. Dagar M, Srivastava M, Ganguli I, Bhardwaj P, Sharma N, Chawla D. Interstitial and Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy: Conservative Surgical and Medical Management. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018;68(6):471-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1078-08.
4. Thurber BW, Fleischer AC. Ultrasound Features of Rudimentary Horn Ectopic Pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(6):1643-1647. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14847
5. Liskovich VA, Yegorova TYu, Naumov IA, Minyuk LL, Gurin AL, Plotskiy AR. Term Pregnancy in Rudimentary Uterus: Clinical Care. Zhurnal Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005;(1(9)):71-74. In Russ.).
6. Elsayegh A, Nwosu EC. Rupture of pregnancy in the communicating rudimentary uterine horn at 34 weeks. Human Reproduction. 1998;13(12):3566-3568. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3566
7. Abdelazim IA, Shikanova S, Bekzhanova M. Regarding Laparoscopic Management 4 Cases of Recurrent Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy and Review of Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(4):774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.020
8. Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, Adamyan LV, Filippov OS, Baev OR, Klimenchenko NI, Tetruashvili NK, Tyu-tyunnik VL, Khodjaeva ZS, Kholin AM. Prezhdevremennye rody. Clinical guidelines (protocol): methodical instructions. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kolesnikova N.B., Marochko T.Yu., Сhuikova A.S., Artymuk N.V. Pregnancy in the rudimentary uterine horn. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2020;5(1):94-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2020-5-1-94-98
Views:
916
Email this article 