Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with the Results of Total Hip Replacement
https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2024-9-1-64-71
Abstract
Aim. To test a simplified version of assessing the results of total hip replacement based on patient survey data.
Materials and Methods. We conducted a cohort retrospective study with historical control. The study included 80 patients interviewed ≥ 1 year after the total hip replacement. Patients were included into the study regardless of gender, age and concomitant pathology. Statistical analysis was performed using EpiInfo software (version 7.2.2.2), Python programming language, and SciPy package version 1.11.4.
Results. We developed a compact questionnaire of 33 questions to compare the answers of patients before and after the surgery. After prosthetics, the self-esteem of the patient conditions improved significantly. The results were stratified into 6 blocks of questions by the odds ratio magnitude: emotional state – 49.3 (11.3-215.4); health status – 42.8 (12.4-147.7); ability to move outside the home –14.4 (1.8-113.4); self-care ability at home – 11.7 (5.3-25.7); overall quality of life assessment – 9.3 (3.1-28.4). Such differences before and after surgery were statistically significant for all blocks of questions (p ≤ 0,008). In general, 81.2% (81.2÷81.3) of patients were completely satisfied with the results of the surgery, and 8.8% (8.6÷8.9) were partially satisfied.
Conclusion. We tested a study design which allows to evaluate the rate of improvement in selfesteem of patients after the total hip replacement.
About the Authors
A. D. Botvinkin
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prof. Aleksandr D. Botvinkin, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Epidemiology
1, Krasnogo Vosstaniya Street, Irkutsk, 664003
V. A. Koryak
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Valentina A. Koryak, MD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Pathological Anatomy
1, Krasnogo Vosstaniya Street, Irkutsk, 664003
I. D. Zarva
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Ivan D. Zarva, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology
1, Krasnogo Vosstaniya Street, Irkutsk, 664003
N. V. Tishkov
Irkutsk Research Centre for Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Nikolay V. Tishkov, MD, PhD, Associate Professor
1, Bortsov Revolyutsii Street, Irkutsk, 664003
O. M. Chernikova
Irkutsk Research Centre for Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Olga M. Chernikova, MD, Chief Physician, Deputy Chief Clinical Officer
1, Bortsov Revolyutsii Street, Irkutsk, 664003
V. A. Sorokovikov
Irkutsk Research Centre for Surgery and Traumatology ; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education – Branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prof. Vladimir A. Sorokovikov, MD, DSc, Professor, Chief Executive Officer, Head of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedy and Neurosurgery
1, BortsovRevolyutsii Street., Irkutsk, 664003
100, Yubileinyi District, Irkutsk, 664049
References
1. Knight SR, Aujla R, Biswas SP. Total Hip Arthroplasty – over 100 years of operative history. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2011;3(2):e16. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2011.e16
2. Oleynyk AYe. Landmarks of evolution of hip joint endoprosthesing. Medichni perspiktivi. 2015;20(2):137-144. (In Russ.).
3. Volokitina EA. The history of development and the scopes for reconstructive endoprosthetics at FSI RISC “RTO”. Orthopaedic genius. 2008;4:10- 20. (In Russ.).
4. Agarwal N, To K, Khan W. Cost effectiveness analyses of total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: A PRISMA systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(2):e13806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13806
5. Trubin AR. Otsenka kachestva zhizni patsientov s travmami i zabolevaniyami tazobedrennogo sustava, perenesshikh total’noe endoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava. Kreativnaya khirurgiya i onkologiya. 2013;3:68- 70. https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2013-0-3-68-70(In Russ.).
6. Khudoshin NA, Abaeva OP, Romanov SV. The quality of life of patients after total endoprosthesis replacement of hip joint: publications review. Sociology of medicine. 2019;18(2):106-109. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-2810-2019-18-2-106-109
7. Ishekova NI, Ishekov AN, Goryannaya NA. Dynamics of the Functional State of the Hip Joint. Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2021;9(4):426-434. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1491-Z080
8. Khudoshin NA, Abaeva OP, Romanov SV. Dynamics of the quality of life in patients after total hip arthroplasty. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2021;17(4):760-764.
9. Gojlo MK, Lundqvist R, Paradowski PT. Short-term patient-reported outcomes following total hip replacement: Is the success picture overrated? Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2021;3(3):100192. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100192
10. Fujita T, Hamai S, Shiomoto K, Okazawa K, Nasu YK, Hara D, Harada S, Motomura G, Ikemura S, Fujii M, Kawahara S, Kawaguchi KI, Nakashima Y. Analysis of factors influencing patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty in a Japanese cohort: the significant effect of postoperative physical activity. J Phys Ther Sci. 2022;34(2):76-84. https://doi.org//10.1589/jpts.34.76
11. Appiah KOB, Khunti K, Kelly BM, Innes AQ, Liao Z, Dymond M, Middleton RG, Wainwright TW, Yates T, Zaccardi F. Patient-rated satisfaction and improvement following hip and knee replacements: Development of prediction models. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023;29(2):300-311. https://doi.org//10.1111/jep.13767
12. Martynenko DV, Voloshin VP, Shevyrev KV, Oshkukov SA, Stepanov EV. Functional results of primary unilateral hip arthroplasty for arthrosis of the hip joint. The department of traumatology and orthopedics. 2020;3(41):46-51. https://doi.org//10.17238/issn2226-2016.2020.3.46-51
13. Cherkasov M.A., Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Bliznyukov V.V., Ambrosenkov A.V., Boyarov A.A., Bilyk S.S., Mytyga P.G., Antipov A.P.Ч еркасов М.А., Тихилов Р.М., Шубняков И.И., и др. The effectiveness of total hip replacement: how and when it should be assessed? Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya.. 2020;5:116. https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30176
14. Fletcher RH, Fletcher M.D., Wagner E.H. Clinical Eidemiology. The essentials. Mosсow: Media Sphere; 1998. (In Russ.).
15. Vlasov VV. Epidemiology. Textbook for universities. 2nd ed., rev. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2005; (In Russ).
16. Fagerland MW. Exact a mid-p coincidence intervals for the odds ratio. The State Journal. 2012:12(3):505-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200311
17. Asilova SU, Ruzibaev DR. Medical-and-social examination and rehabilitation of patients and disabled persons after the hip total arthroplasty. Orthopaedic genius. 2015;2:36-39. (In Russ). http://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2015-2-36-39
18. Kholmatova KK, Kharkova O, Grjibovski AM. Cohort studies in medicine and public health. Human ecology. 2016;4:56-64. (In Russ). http://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2016-4-56-64
Review
For citations:
Botvinkin A.D., Koryak V.A., Zarva I.D., Tishkov N.V., Chernikova O.M., Sorokovikov V.A. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with the Results of Total Hip Replacement. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2024;9(1):64-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2024-9-1-64-71
Views:
428
Email this article 